|
| |
|
|
| |
 The November 29, 2007 Meeting |
|
| |
|
|
| |
From the meeting of November 29, 2007:
Mundelein High School CA_with MPACT mod 1.ppt (.ppt 4.27MB)
Also from the meeting of November 29, the information below was handed out to participants. (For download: MPACT 2 Work Activity web.doc - .doc 107k) |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Results of Small Group Work Activity
Current Facilities & Space Analysis
On November 29, 2007, M-Pact participants heard a presentation about the condition of our facilities. This presentation was divided into a Facilities Condition Analysis and a Space Analysis. The participants were asked to prioritize what should be addressed for Facilities Condition Analysis and the top priorities for Space Analysis. Finally, participants were asked to provide solutions they would oppose. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Results of ranked options or solutions for facility improvements: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
PRIORITY |
FACILITIES CONDITION ANALYSIS ITEM |
1 |
Extending the useful life of plumbing systems including: piping and hot water service. |
2 |
Replacing 87% of roof surface that will exceed its useful life within six years. |
3 |
Updating electrical systems to better meet demand, promote efficiency, and extend useful life. |
4 |
Improving energy efficiency and air quality of heating, cooling and ventilation systems. |
5 |
Increasing site utilization for school and community use to include synthetic turf and track replacement. |
6 |
Repairing or replacing auditorium seating, examining acoustics, exploring stage improvements. |
7 |
Deepening the pool to address code changes, and improving conditions for competition. |
8 |
Upgrading building automation systems: network infrastructure, clocks, intercom systems. |
8 |
Improving traffic flow in parking lots. |
10 |
Updating finishes that are in disrepair (walls, doors, floors, etc.) Note 92% of these finishes are rated good or fair. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Results of ranked items to be addressed for Space Analysis: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
PRIORITY |
SPACE ANALYSIS ITEM |
1 |
Addressing the need for approximately 20 additional classrooms to address future enrollments and desired class size. |
2 |
Increasing the size of the cafeteria, kitchen, and serving areas to meet current design standards and projected enrollments. |
3 |
Increasing the size of science labs to meet current square footage standards. |
4 |
Increasing the size of classrooms to meet current square footage standards. |
5 |
Increasing the size and height of band and choir rooms to improve acoustics and to provide more functional practice and storage spaces. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Listed in order of priority (several items tied) are potential solutions that were opposed: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS WE OPPOSE: |
1. Do not reduce graduation requirements
|
2. No trailers, mobiles
Do not increase class size
Do not have split shifts
|
3. Do not cut programs to add space
Do not consider year-round school
Avoid loss of green space
Avoid loss of parking space
Avoid selling land (golf course) as long as possible |
|
|
